Berkeleybee
03-07 06:45 PM
There is nothing going on with isnamerica.
Though apparently, even with 28,000 members they don't have their own presentation, they plan to poach ours! Not by asking if they could btw, just poaching.
Check this out
http://www.isnamerica.org/forums/showthread.php?t=410&page=7
Though apparently, even with 28,000 members they don't have their own presentation, they plan to poach ours! Not by asking if they could btw, just poaching.
Check this out
http://www.isnamerica.org/forums/showthread.php?t=410&page=7
wallpaper Newsweek newsweek romney.
munnu77
05-06 06:04 PM
Hello
Whm i transferred my H1B to another company, i missed filing filing for H4.
So she was having I 94 of my old company till Nov 2006.
Whn i changed company agn in Dec 06, thats whn i relised her i 94 expired, we submited I 539 for her xtension. but couldnt get it. she exited the country before 180 days of her expiration and planning to apply for new visa in India.
Did anybody had the same experience. Pls share.
Thank u for ur replies
Whm i transferred my H1B to another company, i missed filing filing for H4.
So she was having I 94 of my old company till Nov 2006.
Whn i changed company agn in Dec 06, thats whn i relised her i 94 expired, we submited I 539 for her xtension. but couldnt get it. she exited the country before 180 days of her expiration and planning to apply for new visa in India.
Did anybody had the same experience. Pls share.
Thank u for ur replies
thomasstuart
11-25 03:35 AM
PIO is a foreign national who has Indian origins or Indian ancestors and OCI is verseas Indians who migrated from India after 26th January, 1950, except those from Pakistan and Bangladesh.
2011 newsweek romney. newsweek
dilbert_cal
01-04 05:22 AM
BeautifulMind,
Since all of this has already happened, harping on what could had been done is useless. From my limited knowledge of immigration, I think you have no choice but to file another PERM and forget about your earlier case.
Since all of this has already happened, harping on what could had been done is useless. From my limited knowledge of immigration, I think you have no choice but to file another PERM and forget about your earlier case.
more...
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
iv_india
07-22 04:30 PM
Hi All, My question is similar to this question as asked by MSS (Do I need an AC21 filing?). But it's diff in few ways. Here are the details of my case:
I worked with my GC "sponser" (i.e. Ex-employer i.e. A) for exactly a year; then next employer for 4 months; then next employer for 15 months and now I am with my current employer (i.e. B) since 2006.
All this means is that in between I have changed TWO employers and currently with a 3rd employer for more than 2 years. Also it means even though my labor was filed while with employer "A" but I left them even before my labor was approved. I started working with my next employer (other than B) before my labor with A was approved, but my GC process continued with A.
fyi, I am calling my ex-employer who is sponser of GC application as "A" and my current employer as "B". In our discussions, I am not giving any name to in-between employers.
My GC dates have become current with A (It's a 2004, EB2 case).
I have not used my EAD yet with any of the employers and so does my wife. i.e. I am on H1B with current employer. Also I never filed AC21 for any of the employers.
140 approved for more than 5 months (but less than 180 days) and I-485 pending for more than 11 months.
Now here are few questions I have:
1. Do I need to file AC21 or not? and why?
2. How filing/not filing of AC21 can impact my citizenship?
3. Is my pending labor with B an issue for the dis/approval of AC21?
4. After getting GC with A how does it affect my employment/H1B with B?
5. What if I get the GC before I file the AC21?
6. Do you see any issues with portability, in general (keeping in mind that, I already left �A� and the GC is for future employment?)
Thanks much!
I worked with my GC "sponser" (i.e. Ex-employer i.e. A) for exactly a year; then next employer for 4 months; then next employer for 15 months and now I am with my current employer (i.e. B) since 2006.
All this means is that in between I have changed TWO employers and currently with a 3rd employer for more than 2 years. Also it means even though my labor was filed while with employer "A" but I left them even before my labor was approved. I started working with my next employer (other than B) before my labor with A was approved, but my GC process continued with A.
fyi, I am calling my ex-employer who is sponser of GC application as "A" and my current employer as "B". In our discussions, I am not giving any name to in-between employers.
My GC dates have become current with A (It's a 2004, EB2 case).
I have not used my EAD yet with any of the employers and so does my wife. i.e. I am on H1B with current employer. Also I never filed AC21 for any of the employers.
140 approved for more than 5 months (but less than 180 days) and I-485 pending for more than 11 months.
Now here are few questions I have:
1. Do I need to file AC21 or not? and why?
2. How filing/not filing of AC21 can impact my citizenship?
3. Is my pending labor with B an issue for the dis/approval of AC21?
4. After getting GC with A how does it affect my employment/H1B with B?
5. What if I get the GC before I file the AC21?
6. Do you see any issues with portability, in general (keeping in mind that, I already left �A� and the GC is for future employment?)
Thanks much!
more...
ca_immigrant
02-05 01:41 PM
Apologies if I should have looked this up somewhere within IV .
Guess it is a simple question.
What does a soft LUD mean ? I have often read that term on the forum.
I at times see that something was updated on my case..."last updated date" but then there is no status update.....for example this happened on my I131 application on Feb 4, 2009
On the I485 I think it is just that they transferred it from one office to another as the status says.
=============================
Last updated | Form number
2/4/2009 | I131
2/5/2009 | I485
===============================
Guess it is a simple question.
What does a soft LUD mean ? I have often read that term on the forum.
I at times see that something was updated on my case..."last updated date" but then there is no status update.....for example this happened on my I131 application on Feb 4, 2009
On the I485 I think it is just that they transferred it from one office to another as the status says.
=============================
Last updated | Form number
2/4/2009 | I131
2/5/2009 | I485
===============================
2010 newsweek newsweek romney.
redelite
10-06 10:18 AM
Fun fun. Congrats man! That contest was pretty fun. Good job everyone on all the smileys, thanks to all the judges and people that voted me in the top 3 and thanks to Kirupa for the contest.
more...
sledge_hammer
03-15 03:51 PM
Good find!
Has this issue been discussed in an other thread already?
Murthy.com posted this topic
Proposed Changes to I-129 Would Affect H1B & Other Employers
MurthyDotCom : Proposed Changes to I-129 Would Affect H1B & Other Employers (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_cha129.html)
I believe this topic hasn't been discussed on IV. Looks like the proposed changes are going to make lives of Consulting company employees much harder. Thoughts from IV members?
Has this issue been discussed in an other thread already?
Murthy.com posted this topic
Proposed Changes to I-129 Would Affect H1B & Other Employers
MurthyDotCom : Proposed Changes to I-129 Would Affect H1B & Other Employers (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_cha129.html)
I believe this topic hasn't been discussed on IV. Looks like the proposed changes are going to make lives of Consulting company employees much harder. Thoughts from IV members?
hair newsweek cover romney.
kadarm
01-02 11:37 AM
My attorney filed a SR. Can I call USCIS to get an update. The online update still says pending.
more...
marty
03-14 02:59 PM
I am almost in the same situation. My PD will hopefully be current in next bulletin and I've decided its worth to wait for couple of more months and not deal with any complications that may arise due to job change.
hot newsweek romney cover.
roseball
04-05 04:52 PM
You dont have to apply for a COS as long as she is leaving US before her current I-94 expires. However, note that when she goes for her H4 interview, she might be asked to prove her H1 status by showing her employment details (recent pay checks, tax documents..) in addition to your employment documents before they give her the H4 Visa...This happened with one of my friends at Chennai embassy...Just wanted to give you a heads up on that....
more...
house newsweek romney.
vactorboy29
09-21 03:20 PM
For us it took @ 104 days to get AP approved.
Receipt Date - 04 June 2010
Aprroved Date 17 Sep 2010
Still i am wating on EAD,EAD was applied same time.We had RFE on June 22 resubmitted now system showing June 25 receipt date.
Receipt Date - 04 June 2010
Aprroved Date 17 Sep 2010
Still i am wating on EAD,EAD was applied same time.We had RFE on June 22 resubmitted now system showing June 25 receipt date.
tattoo Walter Kirn on why Mitt Romney
aandb
03-03 09:46 AM
This is a bit of a convoluted question, so I'll start at the beginning. In 2005 my husband(UK citizen, I'm a US citizen) was arrested for domestic violence. At that time, he had been overstaying his visa waiver for about 9 months, as we had been meaning to file his request for permanent residency, but had been lazy and put it off. Anyway, since he overstayed, USCIS took him to a detention center, where he stayed for about a month, and one day they just told him he was going home, they bought him a plane ticket, and sent him on his way. He never received any papers of any kind, all that happened was that his A-number was written in his passport. One of the agents told him he'd have a 3 year ban, another told him it would be 10 years. So, anyway, it's 4 1/2 years later, and we've started trying to find out when he could possibly re-enter, just to visit(we both live in the UK now, but still have family in the States). From what we read, we realized that maybe he wasn't actually technically deported. We called EIOR and found out that his A-number isn't in their system, so obviously he wasn't actually deported. The woman there said it sounds more like an expedited removal. We tried asking ICE what the length of his ban is, and they said we'd have to file a FOIA to find that out. So, until we do that, we're going with the working theory that it's a 5 year ban, since that seems to be what you get for expedited removals. Anyway, if it does turn out to be a 5 year ban, he'd be able to return in a few months, which would be awesome, but we're wondering what the chances of getting approved for a B-2 are. Also, assuming they let him visit, what are the chances of him ever getting a spouse visa, so we could one day move back to the US? Thanks!
more...
pictures I find Newsweek#39;s cover
gc4vk
06-23 03:09 PM
Hello ALL,
My spouse and myself are called for 485 initial interview, have couple of questions.
1) Do I need to take Affidavit of Support docs(form I 864), my 485 is employment based and not family based(I am the primary applicant)
2)Do I need to take Original I 140 and Original Labor approved doc
also please let me now if some one have been to such interviews and if there are any suggestion?
EB3-IN,
PD : June-1-06, NSC
I140 approved - Jan, 2007.
485 Filed -- Aug 2007
My spouse and myself are called for 485 initial interview, have couple of questions.
1) Do I need to take Affidavit of Support docs(form I 864), my 485 is employment based and not family based(I am the primary applicant)
2)Do I need to take Original I 140 and Original Labor approved doc
also please let me now if some one have been to such interviews and if there are any suggestion?
EB3-IN,
PD : June-1-06, NSC
I140 approved - Jan, 2007.
485 Filed -- Aug 2007
dresses Mitt Romney Gets Book of
Saralayar
03-14 07:47 PM
My 140 (filed concurrently with 485) was approved on Aug 17th. Ever since 08/17 I have been seeing LUD's on it everyday. In fact there was a LUP on 08/19 Sunday! Any ideas what's happening? I think something is going in CIS.
I got a LUD on my November 2005 approved I 140 on 03/13/08. My I 485 reciept date is August 7th, 2007. I got all reciepts, EAD and FP notices. I am in EB3 category. Need to know why LUD on I 140. :confused:
I got a LUD on my November 2005 approved I 140 on 03/13/08. My I 485 reciept date is August 7th, 2007. I got all reciepts, EAD and FP notices. I am in EB3 category. Need to know why LUD on I 140. :confused:
more...
makeup hairstyles Mitt Romney#39;s presidential newsweek romney. house sarah palin
mk26
04-25 03:42 PM
All,
I recently came back from India, and got a new I-94 at port of entry, but later I noticed that CBP officer added 10 more days to my I-94 expiry(it may be a mistake by the officer)
Do I need to worry about this? any advice/suggetion?
Thanks -MK
I recently came back from India, and got a new I-94 at port of entry, but later I noticed that CBP officer added 10 more days to my I-94 expiry(it may be a mistake by the officer)
Do I need to worry about this? any advice/suggetion?
Thanks -MK
girlfriend mitt-romney-jon-huntsman-
upuaut8
04-20 10:17 PM
you can get the full version of swift 3d v2 at
****************************
i hope you enjoy it as much as i do
~flash weasel
(You are warned. Do not post links to software on this site unless it is an authorized dealer of that software. You will not be warned again, you're account will be submitted to ezboard for cancelation if I see you doing this again.)
****************************
i hope you enjoy it as much as i do
~flash weasel
(You are warned. Do not post links to software on this site unless it is an authorized dealer of that software. You will not be warned again, you're account will be submitted to ezboard for cancelation if I see you doing this again.)
hairstyles Newsweek is setting up the
ForImmReform
12-11 03:42 PM
You have to be "in-status" to apply for AOS. The IO wants evidence of your continued non-immigrant status before you filed your AOS. Also, remember AOS does not grant you a status. It just lets you not accrue unlawful presence
bugsbunny
08-05 02:47 PM
You can move you H1B visa from Company A to Company B. Talk to your attorney. Because you already have an approved H1 you will not be subject to H1 cap while applying for H1 through Company B.
I do not think Company A can apply for a H1 extension based on I140 and I485 of comapny B. But ask your attorney as to what your options are
I do not think Company A can apply for a H1 extension based on I140 and I485 of comapny B. But ask your attorney as to what your options are
cox
November 17th, 2005, 12:12 AM
The petals are great, but the ones in the background are distracting to me, as I think you were alluding to. I like the shape and the color a lot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment