prestige black ops symbols

images lack ops prestige symbols prestige black ops symbols. hot COD Black Ops Prestige
  • hot COD Black Ops Prestige



  • nixstor
    07-05 12:42 PM
    Just my $0.02:

    I understand the frustration for IV to gather funds when it has so many members. But it's possible that IV has that many members because it is a free site.

    >> Are you saying that we as a IV community do not have any responsibility for the funds or any other important issue excluding pin point specific personal situation questions? <<

    If this becomes a paid site, you might see the number of members dwindle, and that's not a good idea because even if members don't financially contribute to IV, they do offer their perspectives/opinions/feedback/critique and help others. Those who want to financially contribute to IV will do so whether IV is a free or a paid site.

    >> Can you please be more specific about what kind of perspectives, idead , opinions that can be helpful to others ? The so called helpful perspectives lack hte basic perspective that this is a community effort and lets do our part. How many called a senator's office or a congress man's office? How many sent email to media? Those who will pay will always pay. Thats why we might never win, because a segment of IV community is not stronger than the whole IV community <<

    IMHO, it would be a mistake to make IV a paid site thinking that this will force members to financially contribute. Sure IV forums helped a lot with finding information about I-485 applications, but people have been filing I-485s on their own even before IV was in existence. Which is not to say, IV has no value, but I hope you see where I am going with this....if members don't want to contribute, then they won't. They will go to other forums like they used to before IV was in existence...which will be a step down, but at least they are holding on to their $20 or howmuchever.

    >> Forcing? Are you serious? Would we work for some one for free? We are helping ourselves, working for ourselves. There is absolutely no sense of "ourselves" in your wording. Forcing?? You realized that every one is worried about it but dont do a jack about it. Instead of encouraging people to contribute, you are using terms like forcing. I filed my 485 myself and I have gotten a lot of help from people on IV. I dont understand how losing a bunch of people will be the biggest loss on the face of earth. <<

    Before replying to this, please read my disclaimer below. I have to add it given the fact how hot-headed/short-tempered members have been in the last few days where they will flame someone just because their opinions differ.

    Thanks,
    Jayant

    Disclaimer: These are my opinions. You don't have to agree with them. If you disagree, just ignore them. I am not interested in justifying myself about anything that you might have to say. I would, however, welcome a civil and a healthy discussion.

    Jayant,

    I totally understand what you are saying. We have to streamline our energy and you can see a lot of people are hot right now. Do not consider my response as an intention to flame you. I am concerned that we are not going in the right direction. The media drive threads and the funding threads go out of the home page in one sec. Why? 3 or 4 people has to keep on bumping those threads. When will that stop?





    wallpaper hot COD Black Ops Prestige prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols in
  • lack ops prestige symbols in



  • johnwright03
    07-01 09:38 AM
    06/30/2007: Potential EB Visa Number Exhaution in July and Probable Actions of State Department or USCIS

    * By now, people understand that the sources of potential action by the State Department or USCIS are predicated on the two important facts. One was the information from a government source that there were only about 40,000 numbers left for the entire EB visa numbers for the FY 2007 which ends on September 30, 2007. The second important fact was that reportedly the USCIS alone had far more than 40,000 I-485 applications in the backlog queue that were reportedly ready for approval. Considering the fact that the immigrant visa numbers are consumed by the approval of I-485 applications by the USCIS and the approval of immigant visa applications in the consular processing by visa posts througout the world, 40,000 visa numbers could be fairly quickly exhausted in early July 2007. This prediction was exacerbated by the information that the USCIS was apparently picking up the pace of I-485 adjudications lately.

    * Obviously the State Department has been in communication with the USCIS and was well aware of the situation. Sources reported that the State Department might revise the July Visa Bulletin either Monday or Tuesday to reflect the situation. However, it is unclear at this point whether this will occur on Monday or Tuesday or, for that matter, some time soon, particulary considering the ongoing uproar in the nation. Assuming that the EB immigrant visa number will be exhausted before the end of July, from the government perspectives, they may have two options to handle this matter. One is the State Department revises the Visa Bulletin based on the newly developed facts and predictions. The other option is that the State Department does not take any action of revising the Visa Bulletin but just notify the USCIS when the visa numbers for certain categories are exhausted. The initial sources of rumor was the former possibility. However, as updated by the AILA afterwards, it might or might not happen.

    * Whether the State Department revises the July visa bulletin or not, the fact will remain that 40,000 numbers could indeed be run out in a fairly short period of time in July. It is too obvious that under the statute, when the visa numbers are exhausted, the USCIS will not be able to approve any I-485 applications, and for that reason, the USCIS may wrongly reject the incoming I-485 applications or return I-485 applications which were received after the date when the visa number is exhausted. This happened for the "other worker" category in June when the priority date was current in June for certain other workers. The issue of legality of such action of the USCIS is rooted in the required distinction of the USCIS statutory mandates between its job of adjudication of 485 applications "already in the pipeline" and its job of "accepting new 485 applications." Arguably, when the visa number runs out, there is no question about that the USCIS should not and cannot adjudicate and approve any 485 applications. But there is no legal basis that the USCIS should not and cannot "accept" new 485 applications when the cases fall within the cut-off date of the monthly visa bulletin. If the State Department attempts to revise the July Visa Bulletin, probably they are doing it to overcome the predicament of the USCIS that will face in rejecting the new 485 applications. The problem is the State Department's own legal problem or authority to revise the published Visa Bulletin. Accordingly, either USCIS or State Department will be liable for either abuse of power or arbitrary act depending on who acts. The AILF is planning to sue the USCIS for rejecting "other worker" new 485 applications in June probably on ultra vires or other statutory authority grounds. Should the same thing happen in July, the AILF intends to extend its lawsuit to cover the July 2007 485 applicants, probably in the form of class action. What happens if the State Department revises the Visa Bulletin and the USCIS rejects the new applications based on the new Visa Bulletin? Strictly speaking, there may be no cause of action against the USCIS in that it followed the State Department's Visa Bulletin for the month of July. In this case, probably the lawsuit will have to be directed to the State Department for violation of law in revising the visa bulletin. We will soon find out.

    * Where does this leave to the July 485 applicants? Fact remains that all likelihood, the annual limit may reach fairly early in July and they should file their cases before the visa posts and the USCIS exhaust all the numbers. They have to do this probably for the two reasons. One is that should the government take the second option of rejecting new cases after reaching the limit just as we experienced in the other worker cases, those who filed the I-485 application before that date will not be affected. Those who files the application after the date of exhaution and receive rejection of the 485 applications may be entitled to sue the USCIS either in a class action or individually. Secondly, if the government takes the first option of the State Department revising the July Visa Bulletin, they will have to sue the State Department and for that purpose, they should have filed I-485 applications within July 2007. Otherwise, they may have a standing to sue the State Department.

    * For the foregoing reasons, we urge the July 485 filers to file the applications as soon as possible. At the same time, we urge the State Department and the USCIS not to take any actions to avoid the lawsuits. They should keep accepting I-485 applications even after the enhaution of the FY 2007 numbers, even though they will not be able to adjudicate these applications until the visa numbers become current again. Again, the agencies should distinguish the requirement for adjudication of 485 applications and the requirement for acceptance of new applications. These are two separate things.





    prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • raghu112
    11-17 05:08 PM
    I totally agree. I did that 1 month back.

    Had kept new quota in octo. as deadline. No promising change there.. and I switched job to new employer.. better position, better compensation and better life.

    The new employer will start GC PERM labor after 6 months. I have 140 approved from old employer. So I believe I can transfer PD whenever new employer files 140.

    Cannot just wait for years waiting for PD to become current and ruin career.





    2011 lack ops prestige symbols in prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige 15 symbol.
  • lack ops prestige 15 symbol.



  • svr_76
    02-19 10:59 PM
    I'm one of those who say with pride that I can create jobs and buy houses. Then why will not congress or policy makers not touch this. As some here said it depends upon what we think about ourselves. I know many people who like to work under someone even after 10-15 years, my brother is like that, and I know many more like me who want to start companies, employ many people, and do bigger things. Both may be right in their own ways, but if you project yourself like me, then the doors will open.. Show enterprise..

    Definitely enterprising candidates do have the perfect carved out visa category for this purpose EB5. Show them a plan to create jobs and get bank to approve of your plan as being profitable and feasible, to extend you a line of credit and you'll get ur GC in 1 year.


    Its pure politics here..the current bill is an attempt to garner more ethnic votes...e.g.
    UPA never initiates action to press hard for deportation of bangla immigrats (undocumented aliens) in India because those aliens are from a particular community and UPA wants to capitalize on the valid votes that Indian citizen from the same community provide them.



    more...


    prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • reddymjm
    10-21 08:59 AM
    Bump





    prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols wii
  • lack ops prestige symbols wii



  • suriajay12
    02-19 06:56 AM
    How exactly are illegals going to prove that they have been here for more than 5 years?

    I think this is a good one. It supports legal immigrants.
    I dont agreee with this dvb guy. 5 years legally is lots of time. And I now know people who are 10-15 years here. He will want to say the same tthing even in that case. Instead learn to rationalize and make sure if one thinks one is eligivle, then see how one can get included.crab behavior, the one at bottom pulls down the one thats climbing up. Finally both end at dinner table.



    more...


    prestige black ops symbols. Black Ops Prestige Symbols
  • Black Ops Prestige Symbols



  • GCBy3000
    01-16 11:55 AM
    pls update your profile so that we can confirm.

    Update your signature also with your pledge. This will help a lot when others see these kind of signatures. It is all psychological factor to make members feel confident about IV and to make them realize they are not the only one who contributes often.

    Every member has the potential to contribute. It is not a million dollar per month. But how to make them to realize the importance and to make them feel comfortable with IV to contribute matters the most. Adding up your pledge in the signature is a most important for this one.





    2010 lack ops prestige symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • gsc999
    04-22 02:56 PM
    Decipher and GSC999 have totally contradictory opinions . Not sure whom to believe here .:D . There seems to have been 2 sets of opinons here of the members who attended the rally.
    ---
    I think you mean the conclusions we drew are different. Yes, as Congressman Gutierrez himself said yesterday. Some people, he was referring to Latinos who were opposing STRIVE, see STRIVE as glass half-empty. Others as half-full.
    I will want to be in the latter category anyday.

    The objective of the meeting was to show support for STRIVE, I think we acheived that. If your expectation was that there will only be IV members in the group and the congressman would focus exclusively on that issue. Sorry for the disappointment, welcome to politics. Lets learn from this.

    Also, most members think that only anti-immigrants oppose STRIVE. That is not true. Undocumented immigrants also oppose STRIVE. When someone says ,"oh the whole thing was regarding undocumented," well yes but you have to go deeper. Within that group, there are people who oppose STRIVE.



    more...


    prestige black ops symbols. cod lack ops prestige symbols
  • cod lack ops prestige symbols



  • pappu
    12-27 08:56 AM
    Here is the link where I posted in Chinese

    http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article_t.php?board=Immigration&gid=14675155&ftype=0&dingflag=1e link where I posted in Chinese
    Thank you very much. pls help us further by posting in various other chineese websites. We want this organization to have more members from other nationalities.





    hair lack ops prestige 15 symbol. prestige black ops symbols. cod lack ops prestige signs.
  • cod lack ops prestige signs.



  • ramus
    07-02 07:44 PM
    Thank you.. Please ask others to contribute.



    I put in $100 today to fight for our cause



    more...


    prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige levels
  • lack ops prestige levels



  • venky08
    12-20 05:58 PM
    .





    hot lack ops prestige symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • sunnymit
    07-13 03:44 PM
    Same boat as you! Legally in this country for more than 11 years! Hope they approve on time. Debating whether to extend the EAD or wait for the card

    I wouldn't think of not renewing my EAD if I were you. Of course I don't know your case details, but if your EAD is expiring anytime soon, just renew it. Its worth the $380 or so you will have to shell out. Not to dishearten you (or myself) but I know someone who has been waiting to get a GC and he has a PD of Jun 2001. u never know how long it might take...



    more...


    house lack ops prestige levels prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • VivekAhuja
    07-14 05:57 PM
    Consult an attorney because if you applied for I-485 in July 2007 and quit employer in August, you might not be covered under AC21 since 6 months did not pass since adjucation request (I-485) was files with USCIS.





    tattoo lack ops prestige symbols wii prestige black ops symbols. Prestige Symbols
  • Prestige Symbols



  • a_paradkar
    07-25 05:00 PM
    Do you need an EVL if you are just sending in 485 application for your spouse.

    My 485 was filed in Sept 2005?

    Kind of confused. can someone answer that?



    more...


    pictures Black Ops Prestige Symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols
  • lack ops prestige symbols



  • chanduv23
    09-10 03:59 PM
    Andy Garciaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa is coming to the rallyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy





    dresses lack ops prestige symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige symbols in
  • lack ops prestige symbols in



  • sweet23guyin
    01-16 05:10 PM
    As a consultant, I go through similar experience every other year/project. With family growing, I can't digest myself in full time job and settling down in my own house!

    Nice post though, with good sense of humor and timing; interesting subject for a documentary



    more...


    makeup cod lack ops prestige symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige levels
  • lack ops prestige levels



  • good idea
    09-09 03:52 PM
    You know it takes serious $$$ to get anything moving.
    Please consider $50/month level.

    I would happily join this but would I have access to Immigration Voice accounts, so that I can find out where that money is spent? Or that option is only for founder members of Immigration Voice? Problem is not contribution, but awareness where that money will go.





    girlfriend Prestige Symbols prestige black ops symbols. lack ops prestige 15. lack
  • lack ops prestige 15. lack



  • .soulty
    02-27 07:46 PM
    grinch you can use a shader glow material with the material on the object.. let me try to find a tutorial for something for ya.





    hairstyles lack ops prestige levels prestige black ops symbols. dresses call od duty lack ops
  • dresses call od duty lack ops



  • vine93
    10-23 06:05 PM
    bump





    coopheal
    03-10 08:34 PM
    Hello,
    I strongly suggest that we focus our time and efforts on a single and achievable target in this calendar year 2009.
    Recapturing unused visa numbers from the last two decades would help us eliminate the retrogression issue. Other changes like Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Eliminating per country limits etc would require a leap of faith in the political process and it is unlikely to be achieved in this calendar year. The economy, unemployment rates, health care etc are bound to dominate the legislative agenda this year.

    I suggest writing a petition or letter to the White House and the administrative offices strongly urging them to recapture the unused visa numbers.
    I think we should follow the KISS ("Keep it Simple, Stupid") Principle to achieve this target.
    If we add any other immigration provisions, it would increase the complexity of the legislation and it is bound to fail.
    Could the administrators of this forum please consider my suggestion of focusing on recapturing the visa numbers and assign this task the highest priority.

    ....

    If you are even remotely seriously about what you are taking update your profile.





    pcs
    11-11 05:45 PM
    Pl reply, if you want to join me...

    we will plan, find the money and execute it....



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Total Pageviews

    Blog Archive